Why these four axes matter together
Products can be technically possible and commercially attractive while still offering weak human value or poor planetary outcomes. This model forces those tensions into one visible frame early enough to change the brief.
A product that scores highly on technical feasibility and economy but poorly on humanity and planet should trigger a harder discussion, not a faster launch.
Questions for the review meeting
- Does this solve a meaningful problem for someone?
- Is the material and lifecycle burden defensible?
- Can the product sustain itself commercially?
- Can the team reliably deliver and support it?